Javascript is not enabled.

Javascript must be enabled to use this site. Please enable Javascript in your browser and try again.

Skip to content
Content starts here
CLOSE ×
Search
Leaving AARP.org Website

You are now leaving AARP.org and going to a website that is not operated by AARP. A different privacy policy and terms of service will apply.

AARP Foundation Sues Raytheon for Discriminating Against Older Workers in Hiring

Defense contractor posted job ads seeking recent graduates


spinner image a person sitting at a desk with age bias phrases popping up around them
Paul Spella

Mark H. Goldstein, 67, knew there was little chance he would be hired for the job of “Cyber Defense Technologist II” at Raytheon when he applied in May 2019. He met many of the qualifications the job posting required. He has a master’s degree in business administration, has previously had a security clearance and has a professional certification in cybersecurity.

There was, however, one qualification in the posting he couldn’t meet: He was not “currently enrolled or a recent graduate (within 18 months)” of a graduate school program.

Goldstein wasn’t hired for that position or other roles he applied for at Raytheon, but now he’ll have an opportunity to make a case for himself and other experienced applicants who have been rejected for Raytheon jobs due to their age. AARP Foundation Litigation (AFL), working with Peter Romer-Friedman Law PLLC and Outten & Golden LLP, filed a class action lawsuit against Raytheon, which is now known as RTX Corporation. The lawsuit alleges that Raytheon, one of the world’s largest aerospace and defense companies, has refused to hire workers for many positions unless the applicants are recent graduates of college or graduate school. That requirement has prevented Goldstein and many older applicants from competing or getting hired for those jobs.

“It’s disappointing and upsetting that major American companies are refusing to consider older workers like me for excellent positions because we aren’t recent graduates,” says Goldstein. “All workers, regardless of their age, should have an equal opportunity to compete for jobs at Raytheon and everywhere else.”

EEOC previously found that Raytheon violated older workers’ rights

According to the complaint filed this week in a federal court in Boston, many Raytheon job ads have used phrases such as “new college graduate,” “recent graduate,” or “new graduate” in position titles or job descriptions. Other postings required that applicants with a college or graduate degree have less than 12 or 24 months of work experience.

AFL and its co-counsel say in their complaint that the language of the postings and the 24-month maximum violate several age discrimination laws, including the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), and there is evidence to support their argument. In a 2021 complaint Goldstein filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the agency found that Raytheon’s recent college graduate hiring practices violated the ADEA, citing regulatory guidance that states, “When help wanted notices or advertisements contain any terms and phrases such as ‘age 25 to 35,’ ‘young,’ ‘college student,’ ‘recent college graduate’ ... or others of a similar nature, such a term or phrase deters the employment of older persons and is a violation of the [ADEA].”

Raytheon continued to focus its recruitment on recent graduates after the EEOC finding, the new lawsuit states.

“Americans are living and working longer than ever, yet unfair and discriminatory hiring practices are keeping older workers from jobs they’re qualified for,” said William Alvarado Rivera, senior vice president for litigation at AARP Foundation. “Raytheon’s intentional discrimination against experienced job candidates, simply because of their age, is illegal and unacceptable.”

“Fortune 500 companies should know better than to exclude hardworking older Americans from jobs by targeting ‘recent college graduates’ in hiring posts,” said Adam Klein, managing partner at Outten & Golden LLP. “The EEOC has long held that this type of language discourages qualified older workers from applying for jobs and may violate the ADEA. We hope this proposed class action sends a message to all employers that this form of discrimination against older workers has to stop.”

‘The one thing I couldn’t do’

In 2019, AARP spoke with Goldstein for a story about ageist language in job postings. At that time, he had been looking for a job for two years, despite having valuable experience in the in-demand field of cybersecurity.

"Every bone in your body says, ‘Your chances of getting this job are practically zero, because they are biased against older employees,’ ” Goldstein told AARP. “But you try anyway.”

At that time, Goldstein said that during his job search, he had unsuccessfully applied for many openings, including for a large national company.

“I did not hide the fact that I had graduated over four decades ago because I wanted them to know that I had all the requirements that they listed in terms of skills and experience,” he said. “But the one thing that I couldn’t do was to be a recent college graduate. I heard almost immediately that I was rejected."

Unlock Access to AARP Members Edition

Join AARP to Continue

Already a Member?