AARP Hearing Center
Suzanne and Harry Hollack thought they had planned responsibly for their retirement. Harry had worked all his life, and they had a good nest egg in their savings and 401(k) account.
Then Harry, who is 73, was diagnosed with dementia. His condition became so bad that last year he had to go to a memory care facility near their home in Scottsdale, Ariz., care that costs $80,000 a year.
So much for their savings.
When Suzanne, 70, heard that Congress is considering eliminating their ability to deduct the nearly $100,000 it costs for Harry’s care and their share of Medicare from their income taxes, she couldn’t believe it.
“We’re not wealthy people,” Suzanne said. To pay for her husband’s treatment they’ve had to withdraw twice as much from their retirement savings as they had planned.
“That’s bad enough,” she said. “But to have this benefit go away is maddening. I want to have enough money to pay for my retirement years and my husband’s care. We try to do what’s right and pay our own way. I don’t want to have to rely on the government.”
Michael Amoruso, president-elect of the National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys, said the Hollacks ’ situation is a familiar one. “The loss of this deduction would be absolutely devastating to seniors and those with disabilities,” he said. For those who — like the Hollacks — want to use their savings for their care, the loss of the deduction would mean they would run out of money sooner and find themselves on Medicaid, the state and federal program that pays health care and long-term expenses for people with low incomes.
More on Politics
Can I stop getting Medicare if I start working again?
You may be able quit Part B in certain circumstances
AARP Files Charge Against Workplace Wellness Program in Illinois
Construction workers faced health insurance penalties of up to $2,400 per year
Can Your Employer Require You to Get a COVID-19 Vaccine?
Workers have rights, but the answer is more complicated than you think