Javascript is not enabled.

Javascript must be enabled to use this site. Please enable Javascript in your browser and try again.

Skip to content
Content starts here
CLOSE ×
Search
Leaving AARP.org Website

You are now leaving AARP.org and going to a website that is not operated by AARP. A different privacy policy and terms of service will apply.

States Crack Down on Predatory Real Estate Deals

30 states pass AARP-backed laws banning quick-cash listing agreements


spinner image A person signs a real estate contract behind an image of a key and a house on top of stacked coins
Witthaya Prasongsin/Getty Images

In the last two years, dozens of states have passed AARP-backed laws to protect consumers from unfair real estate agreements, in which brokers trade a small up-front cash payment for the future right to sell a person’s home.

Also known as homeowner benefit agreements, these contracts have been marketed to cash-strapped homeowners — particularly older adults — and can be binding for up to 40 years.

That means if the homeowner or their heirs later sell the property using a different listing agent, they could be forced to pay a penalty, which is typically up to 3 percent of the home price. Often the penalty can be far greater than the original cash payout.

Hawaii is the latest state to enact legislation to protect homeowners from these agreements, with Gov. Josh Green signing the bill into law on July 2. 

Learn How AARP is Fighting for You

AARP is your fierce defender on the issues that matter to people 50-plus. Read more about how we’re fighting for you every day in Congress and across the country.

For many older Hawaiians, “their home is their most important asset and the cornerstone of their financial stability,” AARP Hawai‘i State Director Keali‘i Lopez said in a statement. She said older Hawaiians on fixed incomes may be especially vulnerable to marketing that promises quick cash.

State legislatures in 30 states have now passed laws prohibiting these agreements, including Minnesota, Illinois, Louisiana, South Carolina, Connecticut, Oklahoma, Indiana, West Virginia, Arizona, Kentucky, Oregon and Nebraska this year.  Illinois’ bill is with Gov. J.B. Pritzker, who is expected to sign.

In 2023, Utah, Maryland, North Dakota, Idaho, Georgia, Tennessee, Colorado, Alabama, Florida, Iowa, Maine, Nevada, Ohio, Washington state, North Carolina and California passed similar laws.

A win for homeowners

Homeowner benefit agreements are being challenged by attorneys general in 11 states. Homeowners entering into these agreements have complained they were unaware the contracts would be recorded in their property records and could complicate future property transactions and sales.

The contracts also carry over to relatives who inherit the property after the homeowner dies, meaning that under this type of agreement, those relatives would also be forced to use a specific listing agent for a sale or face financial penalties.

Often homeowners signing these agreements say they were not given time to review the paperwork or did not understand the terms before signing.

In Connecticut, for example, many learned about the terms of their agreement only when preparing to close on the sale or refinance of their home, Connecticut Attorney General William Tong said in testimony supporting that state’s legislation earlier this year.

He said about 400 of these deals have been recorded in Connecticut land records, and homeowners have been forced to pay “exorbitant amounts” to have them removed. 

AARP worked with the American Land Title Association (ALTA) to create model legislation for states to follow, with a goal of passing a law in all 50 states.

“Every time a state legislature makes clear that these types of unfair agreements are not welcome in their states, it is absolutely a win for consumer protection and it’s a win for people’s property rights,” Elizabeth Blosser, ALTA’s vice president for government affairs, said in an interview with AARP.

Protecting financial assets

Though the details vary by state, the laws generally limit the duration of these agreements and prevent them from being recorded in the property records or being enforced through liens. Some of the laws allow previous agreements to be removed from property records and let impacted homeowners recover damages.

Join Our Fight

Sign up to become an AARP activist and join our fight on the issues important to people 50 and older.

Blosser said the organization’s members, who facilitate real estate closings around the country, have encountered countless consumers who have suffered financial losses because of these agreements, whether it’s a penalty for using a different real estate agent or legal fees from fighting to have an agreement removed from their deed.

“There shouldn’t be any unreasonable restraints on someone’s ability to either transfer or finance their property,” Blosser said.

Samar Jha, an AARP government affairs director who handles housing issues, noted that around the country, these laws have passed with overwhelming bipartisan support and minimal opposition.

“It’s clearly an issue that concerns every homeowner,” he said.

AARP has long worked to ensure older adults have the financial stability to age in their own homes and communities.

Jha said AARP hopes to push the law over the finish line in other states. Even if companies peddling these agreements aren’t operating in a particular state now, Jha added, “that doesn’t mean it cannot happen. It’s still a practice that needs to be prohibited.”

To hear from a homeowner who says he was misled into signing one of these agreements, listen to our podcast, The Perfect Scam. 

Unlock Access to AARP Members Edition

Join AARP to Continue

Already a Member?